The problem with looking wealthy versus being wealthy is that the former is easy while the latter is not. Within this wealth trinity is where you will find true wealth and yes, happiness. Wealth is not authored by material possessions, money, or “stuff”, but by what I call the three fundamental “F’s”:
Millionaire fastlane audiobook torrent plus#
Your future becomes a mortgage for a pleasant present.Ī Sidewalker’s wealth equation is determined by income plus debt, determined by available credit. Because the Sidewalk is about the short term, it never works for the long term. The Sidewalker’s road trip is a financial treadmill with a destination that typically ceases at bankruptcy or a crisis of reckoning.Ī life on the Sidewalk naturally pulls you to poorness. To force change, change must come from your beliefs, and your roadmap outlines those beliefs.Įach roadmap is governed by a wealth equation and predisposed to a financial destination - Sidewalk to poorness, Slowline to mediocrity, and the Fastline to wealth. There is no wisdom or personal growth gained in a journey that someone else does for you. The Fastlane process demands sacrifices that few make, to resolve to live like few can.
There are four consistent ingredients that make up the winning formula. If you try to skip process, you’ll never experience events. They have and use the entire formula.Īll events of wealth are precluded by process, a backstory of trial, risk, hard work, and sacrifice. When your focus is only the road, your journey is likely to stall and dreamy destinations never arrive.Īll self-made multimillionaires create their wealth by a carefully orchestrated process. There is another way.įast wealth is created exponentially, not linearly. If you want to retire young with health, vibrancy, and hair, you’re going to need to ignore society’s default “Get Rich Slow” roadmap and the gurus spoon-feeding you the slop in the trough. “Get Rich Slow”: Go to school, get good grades, graduate, get a good job, save 10%, invest in the stock market, max your 401k, slash your credit cards, and clip coupons…then, someday, when you are, oh, 65 years old, you will be rich. I better channel the focus into defining what I wish to become so I can begin living it.Wealth in a Wheelchair… “Get Rich Slow” is Get Rich Old This post is getting long simply because I feel like talking. Right now my problem is that I haven't properly instituted "being what I wish to become." yet.Īnyway. (Except there will be methods I need along the way, but these will most likely relate to what I'm doing specifically). There's no lack of idea, or method that I need. Right now I'm not successful, not because I don't yet have the knowledge necessary. This decision is completely ego based I feel I know everything I need to know for my current state of being.
I won't likely be reading it, so I won't likely know if it's worth anything (to me) or not. So to him $400 for his advice is probably validated so long as he's all he claims to be. That he's made many many millions, etc, etc. Pena might very well feel that $400 is a good price for it based on how much value he thinks he's put into it, and what people are willing to pay for information products he's competing with.Īfter skimming the introduction I see he claims to have made very large number of business actions and been at it for 25 years. A scam is when someone lies or feeds you garbage and makes you pay for it. Gouging might be right, scamming might not. I don't know why you suspect he's scamming. Whether or not it's a scam depends entirely on the validity of his claims, and what he's put into the work.
Until then words on a page are just a quick buzz that may or may not be valid, and they may be very limited to who they're valid for. If you pick up a book, apply something within it and know that it works, it's gold. If you pick up a book and think it's gold - that's good. From what I've seen, this is a community where people are only really trusting of results. Forbes doesn't seem to mention it in many posts (skimmed through his posting history, so I may have easily missed it).
0 kommentar(er)
